Schelling versus Hegel: from German Idealism to Christian Metaphysics. By John Laughland
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
the transition from ethics to religion in german idealism
the relationship between ethics and religion, which can be an issue in all the history of philosophy and philosophy in all systems studied. but the discussion of kant practical reason and its separation as a theoretical sense and followed by discussion of metaphysical and theological ethics and religion to the realm of practical reason bring about other effects found. although kant denies all a...
متن کاملGuarding constructivism: the Pl-metaphysics of hegel and naturalists
http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/11/1/148.werner « 13 » These assumptions of separation and connection provide an illustrative example of the relative differences between diametric and concentric spaces as spatial frames for cognition. diametric and concentric structures are necessary spatialrelational conditions for framing the two different constructions of Gilligan’s moral reas...
متن کاملHumean metaphysics versus a metaphysics of powers
The paper considers the opposition between Humean metaphysics and the metaphysics of powers, focusing on laws, probabilities and causation. It argues that within Humean metaphysics, everything is a matter of contingency. Consequently, there is no deep metaphysical difference between a deterministic world and a world in which only probabilistic laws hold. This position is contrasted with the fou...
متن کاملStance relativism: empiricism versus metaphysics
In The empirical stance, Bas van Fraassen argues for a reconceptualization of empiricism, and a rejection of its traditional rival, speculative metaphysics, as part of a larger and provocative study in epistemology. Central to his account is the notion of voluntarism in epistemology, and a concomitant understanding of the nature of rationality. In this paper I give a critical assessment of thes...
متن کاملContinental Philosophy from Hegel
Historians of philosophy writing in English typically construct their narratives as if the authors whom they are discussing were all taking part in a single argument -an argument that is conducted in terms of those problems that we now recognize to be relevant. This appears to leave no place for those who do not share our current assumptions regarding the nature of the issues — who lie outside ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Heythrop Journal
سال: 2009
ISSN: 0018-1196,1468-2265
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2009.00460_25.x